![]() It's clear the DD-WRT team put a lot of effort into their recommendation database. I'm not a complete dick though - I understand. This makes it worse than useless - it makes it misleading, and potentially damaging to your hardware. The lesson here, is that a software recommendation database has to recommend WORKING software to be useful. Hell, Redhat's CentOS is so conservative about updates, some common packages are YEARS behind! This was a major concern when distros started working with centralized package repositories, and open source organizations put a lot of effort into keeping these "recommended software" databases functional for 99% of users with every update. Ubuntu would correct the system IMMEDIATELY, or bring it offline until they could. Imagine if Ubuntu's apt repositories recommended packages that were known-incompatible with your hardware. If it isn't, it's just a very attractive, easy-to-use tool to tear your hair out. Firmware decisions are difficult for most people, so this is a fantastic tool. It's great to have a convenient, easy-to-use router database linked on the front page. Maybe I'm being old-fashioned, but I think this is a really bad way to run an open source project website. Sometimes "recommended" builds even BRICK routers! In my case, the recommended firmware was known to cause connection issues, including dropped packets and disconnects. "The Database may recommend bad builds and you should look for recommended builds that have proven to be stable from actual user testing."In other words: the router database is full of known bad information, use the recommendations in the forums instead. The router database is being worked on improve the recommendations."and Sometimes the router database also has had the wrong build type. SP1 is full of bugs, and while 13064 is not nearly as bad, some are reporting connection issues fairly regularly. I suggest using the builds that are recommended here or in Redhawk's announcement above, rather than the ones in the router database. They both indicated: "The router database has recommended some less stable builds, including SP4 (10/10/09) build. Right off the bat, I was guided to a couple of sticky posts at the top: the peacock thread and the firmware recommendation thread. In this case, the database recommends firmware revision 13064, 10/10/09. ![]() ![]() My router firmware was current, according to the page for my model in the Router Database linked from their front page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |